Just to remember that there is an issue with this, as the previous reviewed-by
tag by me might mislead:
Nacked-by: Claudio Fontana
On 03.04.2014 21:56, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Cleaning up the implementation of REV and REV16 at the same time.
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana
> Signed-off-by
On 04/09/2014 05:54 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> During testing I found this patch causes a regression for big endian targets
> (sparc).
>
> Can you take a look?
> I think it might be related to the extended form of the REV instruction
> needing
> an additional 0x400. See below.
You're right.
On 03.04.2014 21:56, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Cleaning up the implementation of REV and REV16 at the same time.
>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.c | 22 ++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Cleaning up the implementation of REV and REV16 at the same time.
Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.c | 22 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/aarch64/tcg-target.c b/tcg/aarch64/tcg-tar
