Hi
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Claudio Fontana
wrote:
>> Let's change it for IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("use msix, present: %d\n",
>> msix_present(d)); ok?
>>
>
> what about something like
>
> IVSHMEM_DPRINTF("%susing MSI-X\n", msix_present(d) ? "" : "not ");
>
> or just
>
> if (!msix_present(d) {
>
On 23.09.2015 12:29, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Claudio Fontana
> wrote:
>> This MSI-X use vs not use is a bit confusing to me.
>> I see that the use of MSI is controlled mainly by IVSHMEM_MSI (Property
>> "msi"),
>> but then there are if (msix_present()) checks s
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Claudio Fontana
wrote:
> This MSI-X use vs not use is a bit confusing to me.
> I see that the use of MSI is controlled mainly by IVSHMEM_MSI (Property
> "msi"),
> but then there are if (msix_present()) checks spread around.
>
> Could this printf be a bit more clea
On 15.09.2015 18:07, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> Some misc improvements to ivshmem debug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
> ---
> hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 10 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b
From: Marc-André Lureau
Some misc improvements to ivshmem debug.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
---
hw/misc/ivshmem.c | 10 +++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c b/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
index cda7dce..084bc89 100644
--- a/hw/misc/ivshmem.c
+++
