Am 15.12.2011 19:09, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 11/30/2011 09:26 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
>> subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
>> registrations over an existing memory page perform an unass
On 11/30/2011 09:26 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned access.
Symptoms were writes not taking effect an
On 11/30/2011 05:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
> subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
> registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned access.
> Symptoms were writes not taking eff
Am 01.12.2011 10:29, schrieb Avi Kivity:
> On 11/30/2011 05:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
>> subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
>> registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned
On 12/01/2011 07:18 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 01.12.2011 11:06, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 12/01/2011 11:47 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM
Am 01.12.2011 11:06, schrieb Gleb Natapov:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 12/01/2011 11:47 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>> Looks reasonable. S
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:54:33AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 11:47 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks reasonable. Should go into 1.1. Should we backport
On 12/01/2011 11:47 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looks reasonable. Should go into 1.1. Should we backport it to
> > > > 1.0.blah? From 95c318f's description, it doesn't happe
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks reasonable. Should go into 1.1. Should we backport it to
> > > 1.0.blah? From 95c318f's description, it doesn't happen in normal
> > > circumstances.
> > >
> > To reprodu
On 12/01/2011 11:37 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >
> > Looks reasonable. Should go into 1.1. Should we backport it to
> > 1.0.blah? From 95c318f's description, it doesn't happen in normal
> > circumstances.
> >
> To reproduce that I mappped subpage PCI bar over RAM IIRC.
In qemu 1.0, you can no
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:29:48AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/30/2011 05:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> > Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
> > subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
> > registrations over an existing memory page
On 11/30/2011 05:26 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
> subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
> registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned access.
> Symptoms were writes not taking eff
Commit 95c318f5e1f88d7e5bcc6deac17330fd4806a2d3 (Fix segfault in mmio
subpage handling code.) prevented a segfault by making all subpage
registrations over an existing memory page perform an unassigned access.
Symptoms were writes not taking effect and reads returning zero.
Very small page sizes a
13 matches
Mail list logo
