On 6 September 2016 at 11:32, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 06.09.2016 01:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I had a look at the rest of the patches, but to be honest I found
>> it very difficult to figure out whether any of the changes were
>> making the right changes or the wrong changes. So it's not cle
On 06.09.2016 01:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 September 2016 at 22:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 05.09.2016 21:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> I tried "check this compiles and passes the tests for each commit",
>>> and what I found was that you get a lot of new warnings running
>>> 'make check'
On 5 September 2016 at 22:52, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 05.09.2016 21:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I tried "check this compiles and passes the tests for each commit",
>> and what I found was that you get a lot of new warnings running
>> 'make check' about "Timer with period zero, disabling", whic
On 05.09.2016 21:14, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 21 July 2016 at 15:31, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Currently, QEMU ARM MPTimer device model provides only a certain subset of
>> the emulation behavior. This patch series is supposed to add missing parts by
>> converting the MPTimer to use
On 21 July 2016 at 15:31, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, QEMU ARM MPTimer device model provides only a certain subset of
> the emulation behavior. This patch series is supposed to add missing parts by
> converting the MPTimer to use generic ptimer helper. It fixes some important
>
Hello,
Currently, QEMU ARM MPTimer device model provides only a certain subset of
the emulation behavior. This patch series is supposed to add missing parts by
converting the MPTimer to use generic ptimer helper. It fixes some important
ptimer bugs and provides new features that are required for t
