On 24 August 2015 at 17:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Both ADDX_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1 and ADD_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1
> do not appear to be "special" in any way, except that they
> don't follow the normal naming convention using _RRR_.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target-tilegx/opcode
Both ADDX_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1 and ADD_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1
do not appear to be "special" in any way, except that they
don't follow the normal naming convention using _RRR_.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
