On 24 August 2015 at 17:17, Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> wrote: > Both ADDX_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1 and ADD_SPECIAL_0_OPCODE_Y1 > do not appear to be "special" in any way, except that they > don't follow the normal naming convention using _RRR_. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> > --- > target-tilegx/opcode_tilegx.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM
