On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:07:52AM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> On 06/28/2016 05:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> > > Since iommu devices can be created with '-device' there is
> > > no need to keep iommu as machine and mch prope
On 06/28/2016 05:57 AM, David Gibson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Since iommu devices can be created with '-device' there is
no need to keep iommu as machine and mch property.
Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
Hi David,
Intel IOMMU was
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
> Since iommu devices can be created with '-device' there is
> no need to keep iommu as machine and mch property.
Doesn't this break backwards compatibility?
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum
> ---
> hw/core/machine.c
Since iommu devices can be created with '-device' there is
no need to keep iommu as machine and mch property.
Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum
---
hw/core/machine.c | 20
hw/pci-host/q35.c | 12
include/hw/pci-host/q35.h | 1 -
qemu-options.hx