On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:07:52AM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > On 06/28/2016 05:57 AM, David Gibson wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:38:35PM +0300, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote: > > > Since iommu devices can be created with '-device' there is > > > no need to keep iommu as machine and mch property. > > > > Doesn't this break backwards compatibility? > > > > > Hi David, > > Intel IOMMU was a kind of POC until recent development. > The new IOMMU features will require more command line options, > so even if we keep the machine property around, it can't be really used. > > More on this was discussed in a prev thread. > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg377385.html
Ok, fair enough.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
