On 11/02/2016 06:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 02.11.2016 um 11:52 hat Hao QingFeng geschrieben:
>> Sorry for a bit late response. The function looks fine but just some
>> doubt on g_renew in this piece of code(and the legacy), does
>> g_renew(realloc) has much performance impact if it's call many
在 2016-11-02 19:15, Kevin Wolf 写道:
Am 02.11.2016 um 11:52 hat Hao QingFeng geschrieben:
Sorry for a bit late response. The function looks fine but just some
doubt on g_renew in this piece of code(and the legacy), does
g_renew(realloc) has much performance impact if it's call many times
since a
Am 02.11.2016 um 11:52 hat Hao QingFeng geschrieben:
> Sorry for a bit late response. The function looks fine but just some
> doubt on g_renew in this piece of code(and the legacy), does
> g_renew(realloc) has much performance impact if it's call many times
> since alloc and memory copy are both al
在 2016-10-13 4:49, Max Reitz 写道:
Some block drivers may not be loaded yet, but qemu supports them
nonetheless. bdrv_iterate_format() should report them, too.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index
On 10/12/2016 03:49 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> Some block drivers may not be loaded yet, but qemu supports them
> nonetheless. bdrv_iterate_format() should report them, too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
> ---
> block.c | 18 ++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Eric
Some block drivers may not be loaded yet, but qemu supports them
nonetheless. bdrv_iterate_format() should report them, too.
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz
---
block.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index e46e4b2..88a1ea5 100644
--- a/block.c
