On 09/16/2014 11:18 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Do this mean when all this unwinding has occured cc->do_interrupt will
> no longer be needed at all entries will go in via
> $ARCH_cpu_exec_interrupt?
No.
Don't forget the call to do_interrupt in the block immediately following the
sigsetjmp. And even
Richard Henderson writes:
> Cc: Max Filippov
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> @@ -669,12 +669,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
> cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> next_tb = 0;
> }
> -#elif defined(TARGET_XTENSA)
> -
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Cc: Max Filippov
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> cpu-exec.c | 6 --
> target-xtensa/cpu-qom.h | 1 +
> target-xtensa/cpu.c | 1 +
> target-xtensa/helper.c | 10 ++
> 4 files changed, 12 inser
Cc: Max Filippov
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
cpu-exec.c | 6 --
target-xtensa/cpu-qom.h | 1 +
target-xtensa/cpu.c | 1 +
target-xtensa/helper.c | 10 ++
4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
index fe313b
