Richard Henderson writes:
> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvb...@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
<snip>
> @@ -669,12 +669,6 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
> cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> next_tb = 0;
> }
> -#elif defined(TARGET_XTENSA)
> - if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
> - cpu->exception_index = EXC_IRQ;
> - cc->do_interrupt(cpu);
> - next_tb = 0;
> - }
> #endif
<snip>
>
> void xtensa_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cpu);
> +bool xtensa_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cpu, int interrupt_request);
<snip>
> cc->do_interrupt = xtensa_cpu_do_interrupt;
> + cc->cpu_exec_interrupt = xtensa_cpu_exec_interrupt;
<snip>
>
> +bool xtensa_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
> +{
> + if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
> + cs->exception_index = EXC_IRQ;
> + xtensa_cpu_do_interrupt(cs);
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
<snip>
Do this mean when all this unwinding has occured cc->do_interrupt will
no longer be needed at all entries will go in via
$ARCH_cpu_exec_interrupt?
--
Alex Bennée
