On 28/09/2015 11:50, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:35:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This is the first step towards having fine-grained critical sections in
>> dataplane threads, which resolves lock ordering problems between
>> address_space_* functions (which need the
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 03:35:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This is the first step towards having fine-grained critical sections in
> dataplane threads, which resolves lock ordering problems between
> address_space_* functions (which need the BQL when doing MMIO, even
> after we complete RCU-b
On 09/09/2015 08:06, Fam Zheng wrote:
> This patch will probably go in before aio_disable_clients,
Actually I think it's blocked by aio_disable_clients.
> if any, but I'm not
> quite confident about the interface yet: listing a precise set of clients from
> monitor is an ugly coupling between m
On Thu, 08/06 15:35, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This is the first step towards having fine-grained critical sections in
> dataplane threads, which resolves lock ordering problems between
> address_space_* functions (which need the BQL when doing MMIO, even
> after we complete RCU-based dispatch) and th
This is the first step towards having fine-grained critical sections in
dataplane threads, which resolves lock ordering problems between
address_space_* functions (which need the BQL when doing MMIO, even
after we complete RCU-based dispatch) and the AioContext.
Because AioContext does not use con
