On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 07:45:04AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 07:34 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > If it is not possible to implement your FPR code using these functions,
> > we might want to add some more, but I really thing it's a bad idea to
> > have this code in the targets.
On 09/10/2012 07:34 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> If it is not possible to implement your FPR code using these functions,
> we might want to add some more, but I really thing it's a bad idea to
> have this code in the targets.
I thought I got rid of all this in the various rebasing. Certainly it's
On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 02:04:25PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> At the same time, tidy other usages of tcg_gen_deposit_i64.
> In some cases we can "type cast" rather than extend, and in
> others we can allow tcg_gen_deposit_i64 itself to optimize
> the HOST_LONG_BITS==32 case.
>
> Signed-off-
At the same time, tidy other usages of tcg_gen_deposit_i64.
In some cases we can "type cast" rather than extend, and in
others we can allow tcg_gen_deposit_i64 itself to optimize
the HOST_LONG_BITS==32 case.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-s390x/translate.c | 68 +
