On Tue, 08/02 15:24, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 08/02 08:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 29/07/2016 12:22, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > At system_reset, there is no point in retrying the queued request,
> > > because the driver that issued the request won't be around any more.
> > >
> > > Anal
On Tue, 08/02 08:46, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 29/07/2016 12:22, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > At system_reset, there is no point in retrying the queued request,
> > because the driver that issued the request won't be around any more.
> >
> > Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek
> > Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek
On 29/07/2016 12:22, Fam Zheng wrote:
> At system_reset, there is no point in retrying the queued request,
> because the driver that issued the request won't be around any more.
>
> Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c
On Fri, 07/29 12:41, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> So how about turning this patch into a two part series: the first patch
> should drop the comment, and reference
> 6e40b3bfc7e82823cf4df5f0bf668f56db41e53a, while the second patch should be
> this patch?
Good idea, I'm sending a separate patch to remove t
Fam,
On 07/29/16 12:22, Fam Zheng wrote:
> At system_reset, there is no point in retrying the queued request,
> because the driver that issued the request won't be around any more.
>
> Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
> ---
> hw/block/virtio-blk
At system_reset, there is no point in retrying the queued request,
because the driver that issued the request won't be around any more.
Analyzed-by: Laszlo Ersek
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng
---
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git
