On Fri, 07/29 12:41, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > So how about turning this patch into a two part series: the first patch > should drop the comment, and reference > 6e40b3bfc7e82823cf4df5f0bf668f56db41e53a, while the second patch should be > this patch?
Good idea, I'm sending a separate patch to remove the comment. Fam
