Le 16/08/2016 à 19:31, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 16 August 2016 at 18:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>> The best approach I can think of is to add something at the
>>> top of syscall.c that does:
>>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 9
>>> #define IFLA_BR_G
On 16 August 2016 at 18:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>> The best approach I can think of is to add something at the
>> top of syscall.c that does:
>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 9
>> #define IFLA_BR_GROUP_FWD_MASK 9
>> #endif
>> #if IFLA_BR_MAX < 10
>> #defi
Le 16/08/2016 à 18:51, Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>>> cod
On 16.08.2016 18:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>>> code assum
On 16 August 2016 at 17:41, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of i
Le 16/08/2016 à 11:47, Michal Privoznik a écrit :
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of the
On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of
On 16.08.2016 12:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
>> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
>> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
>> b
On 16 August 2016 at 10:47, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
> So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
> code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
> because most of the symbols there (if not all of
In c5dff280 we tried to make us understand netlink messages more.
So we've added a code that does some translation. However, the
code assumed linux-headers to be at least version 4.4 of it
because most of the symbols there (if not all of them) were added
in just that release. This, however, breaks
10 matches
Mail list logo
