On 27 September 2018 at 06:28, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Speaking of the minimum GCC version that we require: Did we ever
> officially define that? Or is it just a result from appendix C in our
> qemu-doc? I guess the minimum GCC could be defined to 4.2 since that's
> the compiler that was still used i
On 2018-09-26 20:57, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 September 2018 at 16:59, Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> +/*
>> + * Clang 3.4 claims to be compatible with GCC 4.2, but does not have the
>> + * "flatten" attribute, so we've got to handle Clang via __has_attribute
>> here
>> + */
>> +#if defined(__clang
On 26 September 2018 at 16:59, Thomas Huth wrote:
> +/*
> + * Clang 3.4 claims to be compatible with GCC 4.2, but does not have the
> + * "flatten" attribute, so we've got to handle Clang via __has_attribute here
> + */
> +#if defined(__clang__) && defined(__has_attribute)
> +# if __has_attribute
On 9/26/18 8:59 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Older versions of Clang (before 3.5) and GCC (before 4.1) do not
> support the "__attribute__((flatten))" yet. Since at least Clang
> 3.4 is still used in EPEL for RHEL7 / CentOS 7, we should not
> use this attribute directly but with a wrapper macro instead
Older versions of Clang (before 3.5) and GCC (before 4.1) do not
support the "__attribute__((flatten))" yet. Since at least Clang
3.4 is still used in EPEL for RHEL7 / CentOS 7, we should not
use this attribute directly but with a wrapper macro instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
fpu/softflo
