On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 05:57:21PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> Switching the L1 table in memory should be an atomic operation, as far
> as possible. Calling qcow2_free_clusters on the old L1 table on disk is
> not a good idea when the old L1 table is no longer valid and the address
> to the new one h
Am 30.09.2013 um 17:57 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:
> Switching the L1 table in memory should be an atomic operation, as far
> as possible. Calling qcow2_free_clusters on the old L1 table on disk is
> not a good idea when the old L1 table is no longer valid and the address
> to the new one hasn't yet
On 09/30/2013 09:57 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> Switching the L1 table in memory should be an atomic operation, as far
> as possible. Calling qcow2_free_clusters on the old L1 table on disk is
> not a good idea when the old L1 table is no longer valid and the address
> to the new one hasn't yet been wri
Switching the L1 table in memory should be an atomic operation, as far
as possible. Calling qcow2_free_clusters on the old L1 table on disk is
not a good idea when the old L1 table is no longer valid and the address
to the new one hasn't yet been written into the corresponding
BDRVQcowState field.
