On 08/29/2011 10:30 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>
> Forgot the branch:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git fix-pflash
That works
Thanks for all the testing and help. I'll post the fixes for merging soon.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:21:03AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 09:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 08/29/2011 09:00 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >> >
> >> > It does bite, as I saw with gdb. You can even see that from the
> >> > qemu error - it complains about unimplemented command
On 08/29/2011 09:15 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 08/29/2011 09:00 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>
> It does bite, as I saw with gdb. You can even see that from the
> qemu error - it complains about unimplemented command 0xf0, that
> comes from pflash_write() later on.
I wasn't clear enough maybe
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:15:40AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 09:00 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >>
> >> It does bite, as I saw with gdb. You can even see that from the
> >> qemu error - it complains about unimplemented command 0xf0, that
> >> comes from pflash_write() later on.
On 08/29/2011 09:00 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>
> It does bite, as I saw with gdb. You can even see that from the
> qemu error - it complains about unimplemented command 0xf0, that
> comes from pflash_write() later on.
I wasn't clear enough maybe, the code in question is running, but the
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:36:14AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 10:33 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> >> want explicit support in the memory API for t
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:36:14AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 10:33 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> >> want explicit support in the memory API for t
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:38:26AM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 11:37 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> >> want explicit support in the memory API for t
On 08/28/2011 11:37 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion ob
On 08/28/2011 10:33 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion ob
On 08/28/2011 09:14 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion ob
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion object, the
> allocation scheme is changed so that the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion object, the
> allocation scheme is changed so that the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 8:14 PM, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> > want explicit support in the memory API for that.
> >
> > In order to get the correct opaque into the
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion object, the
> allocation scheme is changed so that the
cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
want explicit support in the memory API for that.
In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion object, the
allocation scheme is changed so that the flash emulation code allocates
memory, instead of the caller. This cl
16 matches
Mail list logo
