On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:43:36PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> cfi02 is annoying in that is ignores some address bits; we probably
> want explicit support in the memory API for that.
>
> In order to get the correct opaque into the MemoryRegion object, the
> allocation scheme is changed so that the flash emulation code allocates
> memory, instead of the caller. This clears a FIXME in the flash code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/hw/pflash_cfi01.c b/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
> index 90e1301..b597304 100644
> --- a/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
> +++ b/hw/pflash_cfi01.c
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
> #include "flash.h"
> #include "block.h"
> #include "qemu-timer.h"
> +#include "exec-memory.h"
>
> #define PFLASH_BUG(fmt, ...) \
> do { \
> @@ -74,8 +75,7 @@ struct pflash_t {
> target_phys_addr_t counter;
> unsigned int writeblock_size;
> QEMUTimer *timer;
> - ram_addr_t off;
> - int fl_mem;
> + MemoryRegion mem;
> void *storage;
> };
>
> @@ -89,8 +89,7 @@ static void pflash_timer (void *opaque)
> if (pfl->bypass) {
> pfl->wcycle = 2;
> } else {
> - cpu_register_physical_memory(pfl->base, pfl->total_len,
> - pfl->off | IO_MEM_ROMD | pfl->fl_mem);
> + memory_region_rom_device_set_readable(&pfl->mem, true);
> pfl->wcycle = 0;
> }
> pfl->cmd = 0;
> @@ -263,7 +262,7 @@ static void pflash_write(pflash_t *pfl,
> target_phys_addr_t offset,
>
> if (!pfl->wcycle) {
> /* Set the device in I/O access mode */
> - cpu_register_physical_memory(pfl->base, pfl->total_len, pfl->fl_mem);
> + memory_region_rom_device_set_readable(&pfl->mem, false);
> }
I get the impression that this one is not biting. Reads are not reaching
the IO callbacks at times when they should..
Cheers
