Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 06/01/2014 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
What are the guidelines for when to use one or the other?
"-machine firmware=" if you want to load a firmware blob in a board
specific way. Thi
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/01/2014 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>> > What are the guidelines for when to use one or the other?
>>
>> "-machine firmware=" if you want to load a firmware blob in a board
>> specific way. This if you want to place a blob in m
Il 06/01/2014 08:56, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
> > What are the guidelines for when to use one or the other?
>
> "-machine firmware=" if you want to load a firmware blob in a board
> specific way. This if you want to place a blob in memory at an
> arbitrary location on reset.
"-machine firmwa
Il 06/01/2014 06:36, Li Guang ha scritto:
>> dma_memory_write() work?
>
> what about cpu_physical_memory_write_rom ?
Sorry, I missed that load_image_targphys is already doing the right
thing on reset.
Paolo
On 6 January 2014 07:56, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> That raises some more general design questions:
>> * how is this expected to interact with rom blob loading, -machine
>> firmware=,
>>etc?
>
> I guess it's not. The behavior of "-m
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 2 January 2014 05:50, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> I'm wondering whether blob loading is actually a reset step not an
>> init.
>
> load_image_targphys() uses the rom blob loader code from hw/core/loader.c,
> which already supports reload
On 2 January 2014 05:50, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> I'm wondering whether blob loading is actually a reset step not an
> init.
load_image_targphys() uses the rom blob loader code from hw/core/loader.c,
which already supports reloading the blob on machine reset if necessary.
That raises some more
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Li Guang wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Li Guang wrote:
> Li Guang wrote:
>>
>> Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang
> wrote:
>
>> Li Guang wrote:
>>
>>>
Li Guang wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Li Guang
wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang
wrote:
Li Guang wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
No, please use "realize" and avoi
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Li Guang wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Li Guang wrote:
> Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Li Guang wrote:
>>>
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>
No, please use
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang wrote:
Li Guang wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an
Error*
to report the error.
Also, th
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Li Guang wrote:
> Li Guang wrote:
>>
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>>
>> No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an
>> Error*
>> to report the error.
>>
>> Also, the
Li Guang wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an
Error*
to report the error.
Also, the actual load_image_targphys call probably should be done
in a
reset handler, not at realize time.
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an Error*
to report the error.
Also, the actual load_image_targphys call probably should be done in a
reset handler, not at realize time.
Ok I t
Il 02/01/2014 11:51, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>> > No, please use "realize" and avoid init. This way you can use an Error*
>> > to report the error.
>> >
>> > Also, the actual load_image_targphys call probably should be done in a
>> > reset handler, not at realize time.
>> >
> Ok I think that
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 02/01/2014 06:50, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Li Guang wrote:
>>> this blob loader will be used to load a specified
>>> blob into a specified RAM address.
>>>
>>
>> Suggested-by: Peter Crosthwaite
>>
>
Il 02/01/2014 06:50, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Li Guang wrote:
>> this blob loader will be used to load a specified
>> blob into a specified RAM address.
>>
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Crosthwaite
>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Guang
>> ---
>> it can be used now for a
Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Li Guang wrote:
this blob loader will be used to load a specified
blob into a specified RAM address.
Suggested-by: Peter Crosthwaite
Signed-off-by: Li Guang
---
it can be used now for allwinner-a10, like:
"-device blob-l
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Li Guang wrote:
> this blob loader will be used to load a specified
> blob into a specified RAM address.
>
Suggested-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> Signed-off-by: Li Guang
> ---
> it can be used now for allwinner-a10, like:
> "-device blob-loader,addr=0x4300,file=/
this blob loader will be used to load a specified
blob into a specified RAM address.
Signed-off-by: Li Guang
---
it can be used now for allwinner-a10, like:
"-device blob-loader,addr=0x4300,file=/path/script.bin"
reference:
http://linux-sunxi.org/Sunxi-tools
script file address:
http://dl.d
22 matches
Mail list logo
