On 2012-06-07 18:06, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Someone was kind enough to push that change upstream on my behalf, but
> somehow the piece to update the comment accordingly was missed and not
> propagated. Here's an update to remove the obsolete and now misleading
> comment.
>
> Signed-off-by
A while ago I made a change to make MIPS16 code use the OPC_JALS opcode
"pinched" from microMIPS support as well as the artificial OPC_JALXS
opcode I made up on that occasion so that the fixed 16-bit delay slot size
of MIPS16 instructions is handled uniformly across code, just as the
microMIP
