Hi Andreas,
> > I find quilt patches easier to manage when I need to reorder them,
> > revert, manually edit the diffs (that I routinely do), etc. Perhaps I'm
> > just outdated, but that's the workflow I've found most efficient for me
> > while not disturbing anyone else. I've used quilt pat
On 08/10/2012 09:30 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> OK, so you didn't retract them but Meador did comment:
>
>> > I submitted a patch to fix this issue and the FCR0 issue a few months back
>> > [1].
>> > Andreas reviewed it, but the patch never got committed.
>> >
>> > [1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.o
Hello Maciej,
Am 10.08.2012 15:15, schrieb Maciej W. Rozycki:
Actually there were better patches for the same bug by Meador, including
git-style rather than SVN patches and adding a helper to initialize it
consistently at all call sites.
>
> I find quilt patches easier to manage w
Andreas,
> >> Actually there were better patches for the same bug by Meador, including
> >> git-style rather than SVN patches and adding a helper to initialize it
> >> consistently at all call sites.
I find quilt patches easier to manage when I need to reorder them,
revert, manually edit the di
Am 10.08.2012 11:00, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 10 August 2012 09:48, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Actually there were better patches for the same bug by Meador, including
>> git-style rather than SVN patches and adding a helper to initialize it
>> consistently at all call sites.
>>
>> There's also D
On 10 August 2012 09:48, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 09.08.2012 22:36, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> Maciej submitted some other MIPS patches at about the same time:
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?submitter=4977
>> at least some of which got reviewed by Richard Henderson and ar
Am 09.08.2012 22:36, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 9 August 2012 21:01, Phil Staub wrote:
>> On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
mail saying "Ping" and givi
On 08/09/2012 03:09 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Phil Staub wrote:
For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the patch in patchwork,
like this one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/163705/
Eventually somebody wi
On Thu, 9 Aug 2012, Phil Staub wrote:
> > > > > For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
> > > > > mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the patch in patchwork,
> > > > > like this one:
> > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/163705/
> > > > >
> > > > > Eventually som
On 08/09/2012 01:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 August 2012 21:01, Phil Staub wrote:
On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the p
On 9 August 2012 21:01, Phil Staub wrote:
> On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch
>>> mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the patch in patchwork,
>>> like this o
On 08/09/2012 12:57 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
From: Richard Henderson
On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
I
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org
>> wrote:
>>> From: Richard Henderson
>>> On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>>> > I have verified this change
On 08/07/2012 05:10 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
From: Richard Henderson
On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
I have verified this change with system emulation runn
On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
>> From: Richard Henderson
>> On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> > I have verified this change with system emulation running the GDB test
>> > suite for the mi
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote:
> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 07:14:45 -0700
> From: Richard Henderson
> To: "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Aurelien Jarno
> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] MIPS: Correct FCR0
On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> I have verified this change with system emulation running the GDB test
> suite for the mips-sde-elf target (o32, big endian, 24Kf CPU emulated),
> there were 55 progressions and no regressions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki
> ---
>
> Sen
From: Nathan Froyd
This change addresses a problem where QEMU incorrectly traps on
floating-point MADD group instructions with SIGILL, at least while
emulating MIPS32r2 processors. These instructions use the COP1X major
opcode and include ones like:
madd.d $f2,$f4,$f2,$f6
Here's
18 matches
Mail list logo
