On 6 August 2012 19:21, Phil Staub <phil.st...@windriver.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:28:14AM -0400, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote: >> From: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> >> On 2012-06-07 18:04, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: >> > I have verified this change with system emulation running the GDB test >> > suite for the mips-sde-elf target (o32, big endian, 24Kf CPU emulated), >> > there were 55 progressions and no regressions. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@codesourcery.com> >> > --- >> > >> > Sent on behalf of Nathan, who's since left the company. Please apply. >> > >> > Maciej >> > >> > qemu-mips-fcr0.diff >> > Index: qemu-git-trunk/target-mips/translate.c >> > =================================================================== >> > --- qemu-git-trunk.orig/target-mips/translate.c 2012-06-04 >> > 05:35:53.245610241 +0100 >> > +++ qemu-git-trunk/target-mips/translate.c 2012-06-04 05:39:26.245563823 >> > +0100 >> > @@ -12776,6 +12776,7 @@ void cpu_state_reset(CPUMIPSState *env) >> > env->CP0_SRSConf3 = env->cpu_model->CP0_SRSConf3; >> > env->CP0_SRSConf4_rw_bitmask = >> > env->cpu_model->CP0_SRSConf4_rw_bitmask; >> > env->CP0_SRSConf4 = env->cpu_model->CP0_SRSConf4; >> > + env->active_fpu.fcr0 = env->cpu_model->CP1_fcr0; >> >> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net>
> What are the plans for this patch? It doesn't appear to have been > applied in any of the repository branches. Basically MIPS is currently without an active maintainer, so people submitting patches need to keep pinging them until one of the core maintainers (usually Blue Swirl) applies them. For this purpose the usual approach is to follow up to the patch mail saying "Ping" and giving a url to the patch in patchwork, like this one: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/163705/ Eventually somebody will take pity on it and apply it, but it does require a bit more persistence than for more actively maintained areas of the codebase. -- PMM
