Edgar E. Iglesias, le Wed 14 May 2014 00:54:50 +, a écrit :
> Minor nit, the comment in if_encap should say
> "0.0.0.0 can not be a destination address..."
D'oh :)
Samuel
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 02:44:20AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Edgar E. Iglesias, le Wed 14 May 2014 00:30:09 +, a écrit :
> > > At best I could think of using the patch below, which avoids registering
> > > anything for 0.0.0.0, and use a broadcast to answer a guest which
> > > would have
Edgar E. Iglesias, le Wed 14 May 2014 00:30:09 +, a écrit :
> > At best I could think of using the patch below, which avoids registering
> > anything for 0.0.0.0, and use a broadcast to answer a guest which
> > would have used 0.0.0.0 as a source for whatever reason. I don't find
> > anything
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:15:47AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:59:22 +, a écrit :
> > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:10:18 +, a écrit :
> > > > The search part looks
Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:59:22 +, a écrit :
> On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:10:18 +, a écrit :
> > > The search part looks OK to me but when adding to the arp table, don't
> > > you at least want
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:10:18 +, a écrit :
> > The search part looks OK to me but when adding to the arp table, don't
> > you at least want to avoid adding mappings for 0.0.0.0/32?
>
> I don't see the gain, act
Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:10:18 +, a écrit :
> The search part looks OK to me but when adding to the arp table, don't
> you at least want to avoid adding mappings for 0.0.0.0/32?
I don't see the gain, actually. It would mean burning some CPU all the
time just to save a small po
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:15:09AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Do not special-case addresses with zero host part, as we do not
> necessarily know how big it is, and the guest can fake them anyway.
Hi Samuel,
The search part looks OK to me but when adding to the arp table, don't
you at least
Do not special-case addresses with zero host part, as we do not
necessarily know how big it is, and the guest can fake them anyway.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault
---
This is particularly bad actually, one can for instance simply do this
inside a Linux guest
ip addr add 192.0.0.0/1 dev eth0
an
