On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Edgar E. Iglesias, le Thu 08 May 2014 06:10:18 +0000, a écrit : > > The search part looks OK to me but when adding to the arp table, don't > > you at least want to avoid adding mappings for 0.0.0.0/32? > > I don't see the gain, actually. It would mean burning some CPU all the > time just to save a small potential memory loss and CPU burning in the > rare case when the guest behaves oddly. > > > to avoid for ex garps to pollute the cache with invalid entries? > > Only one entry will be created and updated by garps. The guest already > has a lot of ways to pollute the cache :)
Hi, I was under the impression that entries for 0.0.0.0 are strictly invalid (not about performance). I might be wrong though. Cheers, Edgar
