On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 23:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 24 November 2011 22:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
>>> wrote:
Pretty high up my todo list was rebasing your kvm patch on to
ma
On 24 November 2011 23:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 22:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> Pretty high up my todo list was rebasing your kvm patch on to
>>> master / qemu-linaro (the two are more or less the same for this
On 11/24/2011 03:27 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> If it doesn't make sense to hand off cp15 accesses that's fine,
> though -- I want to do this refactoring for the A15 system mode
> implementation in qemu anyway, because I really don't think we
> should try to shoehorn in yet another cpu implementatio
[snip]
>> A remaining item is to test this setup
>> with the KVM stuff, but it should be a minor thing as long as the
>> kernel headers for KVM/ARM can be integrated with the build process
>> somehow. (Or is there an alternative?).
>
> Ah, kernel headers, good point. QEMU now carries the KVM kerne
On 25.11.2011, at 00:11, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 23:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 25.11.2011, at 00:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Well, once we've got real hardware it'll be more straightforward
>>> because building QEMU on the hardware won't be quite so slow...
>>> Most of t
On 24 November 2011 23:10, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 25.11.2011, at 00:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Well, once we've got real hardware it'll be more straightforward
>> because building QEMU on the hardware won't be quite so slow...
>> Most of this is just because crosscompiling is and remains pain
On 25.11.2011, at 00:06, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 22:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> Pretty high up my todo list was rebasing your kvm patch on to
>>> master / qemu-linaro (the two are more or less the same for this
On 24.11.2011, at 23:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 24 November 2011 20:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>
[...]
>>> I would like some clarity (if possible) of which branch the KVM
>>> support for ARM should be based on. Is it the Lina
On 24 November 2011 22:02, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> Pretty high up my todo list was rebasing your kvm patch on to
>> master / qemu-linaro (the two are more or less the same for this
>> purpose).
>
> if you could take charge on that it w
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 24 November 2011 20:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> This isn't strictly a requirement for KVM, but we're going to want
>>> KVM to be able to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU, and I don't think
>>> that's going to be maintainable or reliable
On 24 November 2011 20:11, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> This isn't strictly a requirement for KVM, but we're going to want
>> KVM to be able to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU, and I don't think
>> that's going to be maintainable or reliable without this refactoring.
>
> Why do we need KVM to hand of
>
> This isn't strictly a requirement for KVM, but we're going to want
> KVM to be able to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU, and I don't think
> that's going to be maintainable or reliable without this refactoring.
Why do we need KVM to hand off cp15 accesses to QEMU? As of now almost
all of this is
On 23 November 2011 08:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 11/22/2011 04:19 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> * the MAP_FIXED static codegen buffer is put at an address which overlaps
>> the glibc heap so we crash about 50% of the time
>
> For 1.1 we can just use USE_STATIC_CODE_GEN_BUFFER. It should not
On 11/22/2011 04:19 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
* coroutine implementation doesn't cope if libc provides a makecontext()
that returns ENOSYS (so we abort on startup)
I have a patch that replaces makecontext() with sigaltstack(), i.e.
going from nice code that does not work to hideous code t
On 22 November 2011 15:05, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 22.11.2011, at 15:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> We're aiming for a reasonable working prototype of A15 guest on
>> an A15 Fast Model host here; we need to fix at least some of
>> the bugs which currently mean upstream QEMU doesn't work on ARM ho
On 22.11.2011, at 15:44, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This email is just a quick summary of what we (Linaro) are
> planning in the way of QEMU work to support KVM on ARM Cortex-A15.
> The idea is to let people know what's coming up, find out if we've
> forgotten anything, and avoid people duplicating
16 matches
Mail list logo
