On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 May 2012 21:20, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 05/15/2012 11:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> In this case it is a regression...
>
>> At what point did it regress? I don't recall win64 ever working uner TCG...
>
> Sorry, I had in mind th
Am 15.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 15 May 2012 21:20, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> [If it's] not tagged '1.1' than I am not considering it for 1.1.
>>
>> If it's tagged with 1.1 *and* in a subsystem with an active submaintainer, I
>> would expect the submaintainer to handle it. I do ke
On 15 May 2012 21:20, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 11:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In this case it is a regression...
> At what point did it regress? I don't recall win64 ever working uner TCG...
Sorry, I had in mind the mmap thing, and got confused with what
I was quoting.
>> Anyw
On 05/15/2012 11:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 May 2012 17:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Known issues == release blockers. I'm not willing to block a release for
uninitialized memory access unless it's be validated by a human (and if it
has, there probably will be a patch already).
Likewise,
Am 15.05.2012 18:38, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/15/2012 11:33 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Hi,
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of
the
second release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release is
meant for
te
On 05/15/2012 11:37 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of the
second release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release is
meant for testing purposes and should not be used in a producti
On 15 May 2012 17:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Known issues == release blockers. I'm not willing to block a release for
> uninitialized memory access unless it's be validated by a human (and if it
> has, there probably will be a patch already).
>
> Likewise, memory leaks are not going to block th
On 05/15/2012 11:38 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 15 May 2012 17:33, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Known Issues:
- There appears to be a failure in make check on some platforms. This
will be resolved in -rc3.
Just for the record: there are a lot more kno
On 05/15/2012 11:33 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Hi,
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of the
second release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release is meant for
testing purposes and should not be used in a product
On 15 May 2012 17:33, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> Known Issues:
>>
>> - There appears to be a failure in make check on some platforms. This
>> will be resolved in -rc3.
>>
>
> Just for the record: there are a lot more known issues.
> Here is a small extr
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of the
> second release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release is
> meant for testing purposes and should not be used in a production
> environment.
>
> http://wiki.qemu.org
Am 15.05.2012 18:04, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Hi,
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of
the second release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release
is meant for testing purposes and should not be used in a production
environment.
http://wiki.qemu.org/
Hi,
On behalf of the QEMU Team, I'd like to announce the availability of the second
release candidate for the QEMU 1.1 release. This release is meant for testing
purposes and should not be used in a production environment.
http://wiki.qemu.org/download/qemu-1.1.0-rc2.tar.bz2
You can help im
13 matches
Mail list logo
