Am 15.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 15 May 2012 21:20, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote: >> [If it's] not tagged '1.1' than I am not considering it for 1.1. >> >> If it's tagged with 1.1 *and* in a subsystem with an active submaintainer, I >> would expect the submaintainer to handle it. I do keep track of it though >> until someone responds with "Thanks, Applied." and will follow up with >> patches that fall into this category. > >> If you've posted a patch for 1.1 and it's a couple days old without >> feedback, then you probably should ping the appropriate maintainer about it. >> >> FWIW, I don't see any pending 1.1 patches from you so I don't know if this >> is a theoretical concern or a practical one. > > My current concern is > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/158556/ > (submitted by Alex, although I see he forgot to tag it with "1.1").
Also forgot "v2" fwiw. ;) > > I'll ping it... > > -- PMM /-F -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
