Hi
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 5:28 PM Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 13:57, wrote:
> >
> > From: Marc-André Lureau
> >
> > This should be functionally equivalent, but slightly easier to read,
> > with simplified paths and checks at the end of the function.
> >
> > The following patc
On Mon, 5 Sept 2022 at 13:57, wrote:
>
> From: Marc-André Lureau
>
> This should be functionally equivalent, but slightly easier to read,
> with simplified paths and checks at the end of the function.
>
> The following patch is a major rewrite to get rid of the assert().
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-A
On 05.09.22 14:57, marcandre.lur...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau
This should be functionally equivalent, but slightly easier to read,
with simplified paths and checks at the end of the function.
The following patch is a major rewrite to get rid of the assert().
Signed-off-by: Mar
From: Marc-André Lureau
This should be functionally equivalent, but slightly easier to read,
with simplified paths and checks at the end of the function.
The following patch is a major rewrite to get rid of the assert().
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau
---
dump/dump.c | 21 --
