On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 06:03:36PM +0100, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> On 11/1/23 17:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> > > On 01.10.23 22:46, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > > > Can you please not top-post. This makes the discussion complex. Th
On 11/1/23 17:51, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
On 01.10.23 22:46, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Can you please not top-post. This makes the discussion complex. This
approach is followed in this mailing list and in other similar lists
like LKM
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> On 01.10.23 22:46, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> > Can you please not top-post. This makes the discussion complex. This
> > approach is followed in this mailing list and in other similar lists
> > like LKML.
> >
> > On 10/1/23 19:08, Mike
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:33:52PM +0100, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> Personally, and honestly, I see no actual use for qemu-img dd at all,
> because we’re trying to mimic a subset of an interface of a rather complex
> program that has been designed to do what it does. We can only fail at
> that. Pers
On 01.10.23 22:46, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
Can you please not top-post. This makes the discussion complex. This
approach is followed in this mailing list and in other similar lists
like LKML.
On 10/1/23 19:08, Mike Maslenkin wrote:
I thought about "conv=notrunc", but my main concern is changed vi
Can you please not top-post. This makes the discussion complex. This
approach is followed in this mailing list and in other similar lists
like LKML.
On 10/1/23 19:08, Mike Maslenkin wrote:
I thought about "conv=notrunc", but my main concern is changed virtual
disk metadata.
It depends on how qem
I thought about "conv=notrunc", but my main concern is changed virtual
disk metadata.
It depends on how qemu-img used.
May be I followed to wrong pattern, but pros and cons of adding "conv"
parameter was not in my mind in scope of the first patch version.
I see 4 obvious ways of using `qemu-img dd`
On 9/30/23 22:31, Mike Maslenkin wrote:
Add a check that destination file exists and do not call bdrv_create for
this case.
Currently `qemu-img dd` command destroys content of destination file.
Effectively this means that parameters (geometry) of destination image
file are changing. This can be
Add a check that destination file exists and do not call bdrv_create for
this case.
Currently `qemu-img dd` command destroys content of destination file.
Effectively this means that parameters (geometry) of destination image
file are changing. This can be undesirable behavior for user especially
i
