On 8/9/21 11:33 AM, Qiang Liu wrote:
> Thank you for all the insightful comments about the separated patches.
> This would be my first time to format a serial of patches. Does it
> look like below?
> [PATCH v3 00/2] title
> [PATCH v3 01/2] fix
> [PATCH v3 02/2] test
Exactly. Otherwise,
On 210809 1131, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/6/21 4:42 PM, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> > On 210804 1451, Qiang Liu wrote:
> >> xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
> >> of an improper index.
> >>
> >> According to
> >> https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/regis
Thank you for all the insightful comments about the separated patches.
This would be my first time to format a serial of patches. Does it
look like below?
[PATCH v3 00/2] title
[PATCH v3 01/2] fix
[PATCH v3 02/2] test
Best,
Qiang
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:24 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>
On 8/6/21 4:42 PM, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> On 210804 1451, Qiang Liu wrote:
>> xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
>> of an improper index.
>>
>> According to
>> https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrascale-registers.html
>> (DP Mod
On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 15:43, Alexander Bulekov wrote:
> As a side note(not strictly related to this fix) should we continue
> joining reproducer patches with the fixes? In order to test the
> reproducer, you need to cleave the fix off the patch. At the same time
> we don't want to mess up bisectio
Hi,
> As a side note(not strictly related to this fix) should we continue
> joining reproducer patches with the fixes? In order to test the
> reproducer, you need to cleave the fix off the patch. At the same time
> we don't want to mess up bisection, so does it make sense to have the
> reproduce
On 210804 1451, Qiang Liu wrote:
> xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
> of an improper index.
>
> According to
> https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrascale-registers.html
> (DP Module), registers 0x3A4/0x3A4/0x3AC are allowed.
>
>
On 06/08/2021 09.00, Qiang Liu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:43 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
On 04/08/2021 08.51, Qiang Liu wrote:
xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
of an improper index.
According to
https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zy
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:43 PM Thomas Huth wrote:
>
> On 04/08/2021 08.51, Qiang Liu wrote:
> > xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
> > of an improper index.
> >
> > According to
> > https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrascale-regist
On 04/08/2021 08.51, Qiang Liu wrote:
xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
of an improper index.
According to
https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrascale-registers.html
(DP Module), registers 0x3A4/0x3A4/0x3AC are allowed.
DP_INT_M
xlnx_dp_read allows an out-of-bounds read at its default branch because
of an improper index.
According to
https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/registers/ug1087/ug1087-zynq-ultrascale-registers.html
(DP Module), registers 0x3A4/0x3A4/0x3AC are allowed.
DP_INT_MASK 0x03A4 32 mixed
11 matches
Mail list logo
