On 1/8/20 9:46 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:24:03 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
[..]
I think read_event_data() is still a bit confusing, even if we get rid
of the 'out:' label, as the flow remains the same. How about something
like the following, which makes it
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:24:03 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> 'out' label from write_event_mask(), handle_sccb_read_events()
> and write_event_data() can be replaced by 'return'.
>
> CC: Cornelia Huck
> CC: Halil Pasic
> CC: Christian Borntraeger
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
On 06/01/2020 19.24, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> 'out' label from write_event_mask(), handle_sccb_read_events()
> and write_event_data() can be replaced by 'return'.
>
> CC: Cornelia Huck
> CC: Halil Pasic
> CC: Christian Borntraeger
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
> ---
> hw/s3
'out' label from write_event_mask(), handle_sccb_read_events()
and write_event_data() can be replaced by 'return'.
CC: Cornelia Huck
CC: Halil Pasic
CC: Christian Borntraeger
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
---
hw/s390x/event-facility.c | 21 ++---
1 file changed, 6 ins
