On 1/8/20 9:46 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 15:24:03 -0300 Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
I think read_event_data() is still a bit confusing, even if we get rid of the 'out:' label, as the flow remains the same. How about something like the following, which makes it clear that we handle the sccb events for unconditional read and for a selective read with a valid mask:
The code reading is better with your suggestion indeed. I'll re-send this patch with this new read_event_data() flow. Thanks, DHB
