* Daniel P. Berrangé (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +0800, huang...@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
> > From: Hyman
> >
> > Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration
> > currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can
> > analysis the migration
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +0800, huang...@chinatelecom.cn wrote:
> From: Hyman
>
> Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration
> currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can
> analysis the migration performance with all kinds of
> migration.
>
> To request th
在 2021/3/24 9:18, Hyman Huang 写道:
cc th...@redhat.com and berra...@redhat.com
Please review, thanks
在 2021/3/20 1:04, huang...@chinatelecom.cn 写道:
From: Hyman
Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration
currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can
analysis the
cc th...@redhat.com and berra...@redhat.com
Please review, thanks
在 2021/3/20 1:04, huang...@chinatelecom.cn 写道:
From: Hyman
Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration
currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can
analysis the migration performance with all kinds o
From: Hyman
Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration
currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can
analysis the migration performance with all kinds of
migration.
To request that multifd is enabled, with 4 channels:
$ ./tests/migration/guestperf.py \
--multifd -
