On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 01:04:56AM +0800, huang...@chinatelecom.cn wrote: > From: Hyman <huang...@chinatelecom.cn> > > Guestperf tool does not cover the multifd-enabled migration > currently, it is worth supporting so that developers can > analysis the migration performance with all kinds of > migration. > > To request that multifd is enabled, with 4 channels: > $ ./tests/migration/guestperf.py \ > --multifd --multifd-channels 4 --output output.json > > To run the entire standardized set of multifd-enabled > comparisons, with unix migration: > $ ./tests/migration/guestperf-batch.py \ > --dst-host localhost --transport unix \ > --filter compr-multifd* --output outputdir > > Signed-off-by: Hyman Huang(黄勇) <huang...@chinatelecom.cn> > --- > tests/migration/guestperf/comparison.py | 14 ++++++++++++++ > tests/migration/guestperf/engine.py | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > tests/migration/guestperf/scenario.py | 12 ++++++++++-- > tests/migration/guestperf/shell.py | 10 +++++++++- > 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> I'll queue it, sorry for the delay in responding to this. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
