Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
>> shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
>> actual implementation utilises the same logic as the rest of the
>> timers so all
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
> shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
> actual implementation utilises the same logic as the rest of the
> timers so all we need to do is:
>
> - defi
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 at 19:32, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
> >> shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
> >> actual implement
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
>> shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
>> actual implementation utilises the same logic as the rest of the
>> timers so all
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 at 16:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
> shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
> actual implementation utilises the same logic as the rest of the
> timers so all we need to do is:
>
> - defi
When FEAT_SEL2 was implemented the SEL2 timers where missed. This
shows up when building the latest Hafnium with SPMC_AT_EL=2. The
actual implementation utilises the same logic as the rest of the
timers so all we need to do is:
- define the timers and their access functions
- conditionally add