Hi Peter and Pavel,
On 8/25/2024 10:30 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> We're currently still in codefreeze for the upcoming 9.1 release,
> so I would recommend sending a v2 with the extra patches. Nothing
> except critical bugfixes is going to be applied upstream for
> the next week or two.
Thanks, t
On Sat, 24 Aug 2024 at 02:55, Doug Brown wrote:
> Now, all of these patches are reviewed but there are a few other issues
> we talked about here (dlc2len/len2dlc and issues with the flags), and I
> also found a FIFO issue. Would it make the most sense for me to submit a
> V2 of this series with a
Hello Doug
On Saturday 24 of August 2024 03:54:00 Doug Brown wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing all of my patches, Francisco.
>
> Now, all of these patches are reviewed but there are a few other issues
> we talked about here (dlc2len/len2dlc and issues with the flags), and I
> also found a FIFO issu
Hello Pavel and Francisco,
On 8/21/2024 6:11 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Vikram Garhwal is listed even as whole CAN subsystem comaintainer
>
>
> https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/3472f54522a928f0020d6928d54c007f862c5478/MAINTAINERS#L2690
Unfortunately I am totally new to submitting patc
Hi Pavel,
(Dropping Vikram from the email chain; I received "recipient not found"
errors from AMD's mail servers in response to all of my patches)
On 8/20/2024 11:57 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Doug Brown,
>
> On Friday 16 of August 2024 18:35:02 Doug Brown wrote:
>> -if (frame->flags
Hello Doug and Francisco,
thanks for cooperation
On Thursday 22 of August 2024 02:01:01 Doug Brown wrote:
> (Dropping Vikram from the email chain; I received "recipient not found"
> errors from AMD's mail servers in response to all of my patches)
If the address Vikram Garhwal is not valid
then
On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 09:35:02AM -0700, Doug Brown wrote:
> When checking the QEMU_CAN_FRMF_TYPE_FD flag, we need to ignore other
> potentially set flags. Before this change, received CAN FD frames from
> SocketCAN weren't being recognized as CAN FD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Brown
Reviewed-by:
Hello Doug Brown,
On Friday 16 of August 2024 18:35:02 Doug Brown wrote:
> When checking the QEMU_CAN_FRMF_TYPE_FD flag, we need to ignore other
> potentially set flags. Before this change, received CAN FD frames from
> SocketCAN weren't being recognized as CAN FD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Brown
>
When checking the QEMU_CAN_FRMF_TYPE_FD flag, we need to ignore other
potentially set flags. Before this change, received CAN FD frames from
SocketCAN weren't being recognized as CAN FD.
Signed-off-by: Doug Brown
---
hw/net/can/xlnx-versal-canfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deleti
