Hello Pavel and Francisco, On 8/21/2024 6:11 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Vikram Garhwal is listed even as whole CAN subsystem comaintainer > > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/3472f54522a928f0020d6928d54c007f862c5478/MAINTAINERS#L2690
Unfortunately I am totally new to submitting patches for QEMU and have no connection with AMD so I can't speak about Vikram's situation. I agree though, at the very least something needs to change in the MAINTAINERS file. Maybe Francisco knows more? > But I would be more comfortable if there is somebody else > who is willing to be at least my backup when I am on some > trip without Internet (hiking etc.). I am quite loaded by > teaching etc. and all these my CAN and in the fact all my > open-source and other development projects are mostly out > of any interrest of the university department where I serve. > They would care a little if/when I bring paid contract from > some company, as we have from Volkswagen and its subsidiaries. > But it is long time ago at university and even longer > at my company. I'm very, very new to QEMU development so I think I would be a poor fit as a maintainer, at least right now. I'm also not affiliated with any big money companies. I can completely understand that the subsystem needs an additional maintainer though. That's a lot on one person's shoulders! Thank you for reviewing all of my patches, Francisco. Now, all of these patches are reviewed but there are a few other issues we talked about here (dlc2len/len2dlc and issues with the flags), and I also found a FIFO issue. Would it make the most sense for me to submit a V2 of this series with a few extra patches tacked on the end, or should I wait for this series to be applied first? I can do it either way, I just wasn't sure what would be preferred. Thanks, Doug
