Hi Simon,
On 12/5/19 11:04 PM, Simon Veith wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> On 05/12/2019 09:42, Auger Eric wrote:
>> Not related to this patch but I noticed SMMU_BASE_ADDR_MASK should be
>> 0xffc0 and not 0xffe0. I can fix it separately or if you
>> respin, you may fix it as well?
>
> G
Hello Eric,
On 05/12/2019 09:42, Auger Eric wrote:
> Not related to this patch but I noticed SMMU_BASE_ADDR_MASK should be
> 0xffc0 and not 0xffe0. I can fix it separately or if you
> respin, you may fix it as well?
Good catch, thank you. I'll fix it in the next version.
Looking
Hi Simon,
On 12/4/19 2:55 PM, Simon Veith wrote:
> In the SMMU_STRTAB_BASE register, the stream table base address only
> occupies bits [51:6]. Other bits, such as RA (bit [62]), must be masked
> out to obtain the base address.
>
> The branch for 2-level stream tables correctly applies this mask
In the SMMU_STRTAB_BASE register, the stream table base address only
occupies bits [51:6]. Other bits, such as RA (bit [62]), must be masked
out to obtain the base address.
The branch for 2-level stream tables correctly applies this mask by way
of SMMU_BASE_ADDR_MASK, but the one for linear stream
