Hi,
> Compared to Daniels suggestion, I find that one conceptually clearer,
> and even more flexible. Implementation-wise I find this patch-set
> simpler.
Given we are in fixes-only mode I think we should go for the simple
solution. Should be easy enough to revert in case we want replace
this
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:56:19 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Maybe not the most elegant but rather simple approach to the "parent
> object missing" problem: Use a symbol reference to make sure ccw modules
> load only in case ccw support is present.
[..]
Hi Gerd! I've tested this and I think mostly
Maybe not the most elegant but rather simple approach to the "parent
object missing" problem: Use a symbol reference to make sure ccw modules
load only in case ccw support is present.
Also split the cpu changes to a separate patch.
Gerd Hoffmann (3):
s390x: move S390_ADAPTER_SUPPRESSIBLE
s390
