Hi, > Compared to Daniels suggestion, I find that one conceptually clearer, > and even more flexible. Implementation-wise I find this patch-set > simpler.
Given we are in fixes-only mode I think we should go for the simple solution. Should be easy enough to revert in case we want replace this with something else after the 6.0 release. > Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> > Tested-by: Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.ibm.com> Added & queued. CI running, pull req later today when all goes well. thanks, Gerd
