Peter Maydell writes:
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 15:41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>
>> Markus Armbruster writes:
>>
>> > PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll
>> > simplify the rST generator's job.
>> >
>> > PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 15:41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
> > PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll
> > simplify the rST generator's job.
> >
> > PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm not sure it
> > does. Peter, you
Markus Armbruster writes:
> PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll
> simplify the rST generator's job.
>
> PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm not sure it
> does. Peter, you tell me :)
I dropped the ball on this one. I think both patches mak
PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll
simplify the rST generator's job.
PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm not sure it
does. Peter, you tell me :)
Markus Armbruster (2):
qapi: Reject section markup in definition documentation
[RFC] qapi
