Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 15:41, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> writes: >> >> > PATCH 1 fixes an old defect in the doc comment parser. I figure it'll >> > simplify the rST generator's job. >> > >> > PATCH 2 might simplify it further. It's RFC because I'm not sure it >> > does. Peter, you tell me :) >> >> I dropped the ball on this one. I think both patches make sense, but I >> don't want to upset Peter's "Convert QAPI doc comments to generate rST >> instead of texinfo" apple cart. Peter, please tell me what you'd like >> me to do: >> >> * Post a pull request, so you can base your v6 on it. > > Looking back at my comments on the patches I think I was happy > with both and it probably isn't a huge rebase issue, so you > might as well send these in a pullreq. You might consider also > including the first 3 patches from my v5 series, which are just > fixing markup issues in the .json that get detected by the > rst conversion.
Good idea, will do.
