On 13/04/2023 12.31, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 4/13/23 07:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
uint32_t dirty_ring_size = kvm_dirty_ring_size();
uint64_t dirty_ring_size_meory_MB =
- dirty_ring_size * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE >> 20;
+ dirty_ring_size * qemu_target_page_size() >> 20;
Exis
On 4/13/23 07:45, Thomas Huth wrote:
uint32_t dirty_ring_size = kvm_dirty_ring_size();
uint64_t dirty_ring_size_meory_MB =
-dirty_ring_size * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE >> 20;
+dirty_ring_size * qemu_target_page_size() >> 20;
Existing problem, the types here are suspicious: di
Thomas Huth writes:
> dirtylimit.c just uses one TARGET_PAGE_SIZE macro - change it to
> qemu_target_page_size() so we can move thefile into the target
> independent source set. Then we only have to compile this file
> once during the build instead of multiple times (one time for
> each target).
dirtylimit.c just uses one TARGET_PAGE_SIZE macro - change it to
qemu_target_page_size() so we can move thefile into the target
independent source set. Then we only have to compile this file
once during the build instead of multiple times (one time for
each target).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
