in machines compliant with SPARC v9 architecture (Ultra1
or better), however the implementation for v8 architecture (and we are
building binaries for v8 in Debian) does not look so simple. I'd
appreciate any opinions or hints on this matter.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov
es: save;...ret;restore;
and ;retl;nop;. Are you saying that the function ending in
retl;some_insn; is valid as well and the check has to be modified yet
again to accomodate this (third) case?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http:
ailure in ppc target. This
is not surprising, because AFAICT the FORCE_RET macro is only used in arm,
i386 and sparc targets. Any other ideas?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/
8 retl
340c: 9c 23 bf 90 sub %sp, -112, %sp
What should dyngen do about a function like that?
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID
not subscribed to this list.
Thanks,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:05:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROT
