On 7/8/06, Oliver Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is wxC still under active development? The CVS version seems to be quite
old, and I also couldn't find any documentation.
Well it wouldn't be the first unmaintained batch of code added to
QEMU... Slirp is the example that comes to mind. In
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 13:04 +0800, James Lau wrote:
> hi everybody,
> For some security issues, I want to detect whether my Windows program
> is running inside qemu. Have any ideas?
>
Security issues? That's a bit vague.
More information about what you're attempting to do would be helpful.
Th
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 03:03 -0400, Armistead, Jason wrote:
> Hi
>
> With SIMH, the VAX / PDP / nostalgic mini/mainframe emulator
> (http://simh.trailing-edge.com/) the console port on the emulated system is
> directed to a TCP/IP port, so that you can simply Telnet into it. Once the
> connection
On 6/7/06, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Basing work on the gcc/binutils code doesn't help me either because I
> > wrote most of that code in the first place :-)
>
> Since the idea is for someone else do it, that doesn't matter.
>
> I'm wondering why, if it were done, it would be a pr
Or, someone who hasn't agreed to the contract could implement armv6
and 7 support.
-- John.
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 16:03 -0800, Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
> It looks like qemu (at least version 0.7.2, which is what I'm running
> here) doesn't set SO_REUSEADDR before calling bind(), which makes that
> fairly useless. This obvious patch moves up setting SO_REUSEADDR to the
> right place
User Mode networking is a little tricky to understand. Imagine the
restrictions on your implementation if you had to implement full
networking for another entity, but you had to do it as a regular user.
For instance, don't expect ping (ICMP) to work since a regular user
cannot create a raw socket.
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 22:45 +, Richard Neill wrote:
> qemu -cdrom /dev/cdrom -boot d -user-net -redir tcp:2300::2301
>
> In Guest (knoppix):
>netcat -l -p 2301
>
> On Host:
>
>netcat localhost 2300
>
>This connection is accepted (Netcat doesn't say connection refused),
> but t
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 01:44 +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> >
> > The use of gcc to generate the back end in QEMU's early days was a
> > clever way to get the project up and running quickly. But surely
> > now it would be better to transition to a handwritten backend, so
>
> It should be trivial t
On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 15:59 +0100, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I posted it on the forum, but as I prefer mailing lists, I post it here.
> (btw : it tok about one hour for the ML "registration" confirmation
> message to came in my mailbox, that's why I posted on the forum first)
>
> 2005-11
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 10:29 -0500, Glenn Gagné wrote:
> I installed Qemu 0.7.2 on Windows 2000 Pro and I run a Windows 95 in the
> virtual environement of Qemu. I have an old
> MS-DOS application to use who communicate on serial port... But it's not
> working in the virtual environement.
>
> Qem
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 23:58 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> > use qemu-img to create the disk image.
>
> That is just creation. I think Stefano meant that you cannot use the guest
> OS to write to that image.
I understood. I just don't believe it; I didn't get the impression
Stefano was say
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 18:09 +0200, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> So, any ideas here on how to easily use Qemu and Synergy? IMHO, Qemu
> would greatly benefit from these features. But I don't see a way to
> integrate the two programs. Do you?
>
Very cool. Have you talked to the developers of this softw
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 12:48 +0200, Stefano Marinelli wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:29:45 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> > Barely on-topic, but since VmWare interop crops up from time to time:
> >
> > http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
>
> I don't like
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 13:22 -0700, Mike Swanson wrote:
> Yeah, it barely on topic. But the .vmx files are extremely simple text
> files, and qemu-img creates vmdk disk images.
That was my first thought when I saw this as well.
> Yes, it's possible to
> install operating systems solely withing VM
Barely on-topic, but since VmWare interop crops up from time to time:
http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
I doubt this is targeted at QEMU, but rather at competing with Microsoft
and VirtualPC. That or they are leaving the low-end market for server
consolidation.
This may in fact be as much V
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 00:34 +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> After re-installing windows 2000 SP3 & SP4 about 25 times on different
> machines, its looking wierd..
> SP4 has a problem when configuring COM+ with no kqemu, but works fine with
> kqemu on all 3 machines
> (PIII, Sempron 2400+ Athlon X
On Sun, 2005-10-16 at 22:02 -0400, John Coiner wrote:
> It was a tiny bug...
>
> Windows does not like QEMU's DHCP server. Windows always issues
> DHCPDISCOVER and DHCPREQUEST packets in pairs: first the DHCPDISCOVER,
> followed by a DHCPREQUEST. The DHCPREQUEST is a sanity check. Windows
> wa
I don't know a lot about Slirp details other than what I generally know
about proxy server and NAT router implementation (I know a lot about
that). But perhaps I can raise some questions for you.
On Wed, 2005-10-12 at 22:34 -0400, John Coiner wrote:
> The alternative would have been to debug the
I'm attempting to do a port of some code to Mac (endianness issues to
fix), but no hardware, so I'm attempting to use QEMU and Debian-PPC. I'm
not having much luck installing Debian-PPC in qemu-system-ppc on my x86
box.
Does someone have an installed image I can use?
Thanks,
-- John.
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 11:25 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:38 +, Juan Martín Carril wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > How i can use Qemu with Dosemu ??
>
> You would install DosEmu into QEMU into Linux or Windows.
> But don't do that, sinc
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:38 +, Juan Martín Carril wrote:
> Hi
>
> How i can use Qemu with Dosemu ??
You would install DosEmu into QEMU into Linux or Windows.
But don't do that, since it makes no sense:
Host OS: Host operating system on which to run x86 machine emulator
(pick ONE)
-
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 09:10 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> > > I don't see any way for qemu guests to be able to
> > > ping each other
> > > (for example) if they are both using user-net.
> > >
> > it would be good to get that working
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 16:08 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> CTRL-ALT-4 is the parallel port console, parallel0. If you added more
> consoles,
> those would take up more numbers. Of course, theres no reason why we can't
> map CTRL-ALT-D to CTRL-ALT-DELETE in the guest, CTRL-ALT-P to the Pause/Break
>
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 15:00 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
> in qemu monitor (press CTRL ALT 2 to reach to the monitor): type:
> sendkey ctrl-alt-del and press Enter
> then press CTRL ALT 1 - and viola, you can type your login and password.
>
> Hetz
>
Implies a nice feature would be to allow CTRL-
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 09:37 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> VMware handles kernel code. You are right that x86 code can't be 100%
> virtualized
> (even at the userland level) but VMware uses a lot of nasty disgusting tricks
> in order to work around them. (For example, playing with shadow pagetables
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:40 +0200, Stefan Kombrink wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu.
> Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware.
> Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user
>
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:17 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> You might want to look at my hand-coded backed for qemu. The intention is
> that
> this will eventually replace dyngen/gcc altogether. Currently everything
> except the experimental m68k target uses a mixture of the old and the
> micro-ops
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 17:59 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> Um, KQEMU/qvm86 don't do dynamic translation. They are virtualizers. They run
> the code given to them (more or less) unchanged.
Sorry, I was speaking more generally (and imprecisely) about the
qemu/kqemu as a combination. As you state belo
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 11:05 -0700, Francois Rioux wrote:
> I notice that QEMU is quite slower than VMWare.
It certainly is.
> Apparently due to the way IO occur. What are the strategies to
> enhance that performance?
Curious, why do you think that? There are probably a whole host of
reasons
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 19:23 -0700, Francois Rioux wrote:
> I don't understand why this doesn't work. Is it Windows preventing the
> write is the exchange this a limitation in QEMU or in SLiRP? As I
> understand it SLiRP translates some tcp headers and acts as a firewall
> preventing incoming call
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 22:27 -0500, Matt Lawrence wrote:
> I've given up on trying to build a disk image manually, so now I'm
> trying to automate the kickstart installation for CentOS4. By using an
> iso of the first CD and a floppy file with a ks.cfg and doing a "linux
> ks=floppy" at the boot scr
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 16:38 -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> I could use -serial stdio
> but how do I get it connected to the usb port? I'm guessing netcat/socat
> but I've never used that utility.
>
> Anyone have a recipe that works?
I ended up figuring out a way
QEMU on Linux hosting FreeDOS running an old DOS serial comm
application.
I want to redirect the guest's COM1 to ttyUSB0 which will have a real
device connected to it.
How is this done with QEMU?
I could use -serial stdio
but how do I get it connected to the usb port? I'm guessing netcat/socat
b
I don't think the original author anticipated or cared about slirp being
ported to a 64-bit processor. I won't speak for the quality of the code
in general, but on a 32-bit machine the pointer size is 32-bit. It's
perfectly safe on that platform to use any 32-bit spot as a hidey hole
for your cooki
VmWare seems to let you do it any way you want. Full screen, scroll it
manually or auto scroll, etc. So clearly it can be done. Maybe the code
in something like VNC client would give some ideas.
Scaling an image *down* to fit in window of a given size seems totally
pointless other than to give a t
On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 23:26 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> You can't due to licensing issues. netfilter is licensed under the GPL.
Well of course anyone one could do it.
Based on keeping "system emulation under the BSD license" it can't...
basically a non-reason on actual technical merit. So i
I was fiddling with getting FTP to work across user-net, and it seems to
me that there are some NAT issues with FTP, and DNS.
These specific issues can be fixed in slirp tcp_subr.c and elsewhere for
udp based DNS, but I'm wondering if this is the right way to go about
it. Perhaps the netfilter cod
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 22:30 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
> booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
> platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
>
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 20:24 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
> >
>
> untrue.
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:19 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
> feedback would be appreciated.
>
It's a cool idea, I think. I went through the mingw thing a while back
and it's a PITA. It would be nice to have known working build plat
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 10:28 -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> Why would anyone want run an emulator in another emulator..
>
> -ishwar
Well at least it's hard to argue with the fact that it's an excellent
'pathological case' to test QEMU.
-- John.
___
Qe
On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> > Did you try passive mode?
>
> nice suggestion.
> passive mode off: "dir" lasts forever...
> passive mode on: "dir" give "connection refused".
>
> any idea?
>
> Christian
>
Suggest some packet sniffs to see who is getting stuck.
--
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 00:15 +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
>
> > I can think of some reasons for a non-native file service that is
> > instead built into QEMU:
>
> vvfat?
>
> > e) Scripts to be used across farms o
I can think of some reasons for a non-native file service that is
instead built into QEMU:
a) One interface to all clients outside of QEMU. Lowers the learning
curve for dealing with different enviroments; at least for some raw file
access they are all accessible in the same way. You can lower
con
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:03 -0400, Olivier Bourgois wrote:
> Has anybody tinkered with porting qemu to something like a TI TMS320C6X
> DSP host. The idea would be to be able to easily port LINUX and other
> open source software to such a DSP.
I would think porting uCLinux would be a better ide
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 18:36 -0700, Nathaniel G H wrote:
> I was up until 3:00am studying Qemu, and I came to the conclusion that
> it doesn't make sense to try speeding up the output code, at least not
> yet. A peephole optimizer or hand-coded sequences made to handle common
> combinations of inst
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 22:58 -0700, Joe Luser wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've been using Qemu on the Mac for a few days now; Several OSes
> running (including Windoze), and I'm impressed. The source looks pretty
> clean, too.
>
> Has anyone done any profiling work to see where Qemu spends most of its
49 matches
Mail list logo
