On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 08:40 +0200, Stefan Kombrink wrote: > Hi there, > > I tried win4lin pro and found it very similar to running win2k using qemu. > Speed (of graphics) is not higher and it uses the same hardware. > Does it contain less bugs than qemu or what's the advantage that makes user > pay 89$ for it? >
Never used it, but here's their answer to this question: http://www.win4lin.com/content/view/131/155/ So you're not imagining that it behaves similar to QEMU. As to whether $X for support, smoothing rough edges and whatnot is worth it to party Y, only Y can say. For myself, I like my computers to need me. If everything just worked, aside from being bored, I'd be superfluous! So I get my QEMU from source control. -- John. _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
