On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 03:13:21PM -0700, Don Kitchen wrote:
> I've used that one "pricey" product at work, but it always seemed a bit
> expensive for home users. But I only knew about some of the other emulators,
> the ones that are so slow you wonder why didn't they warn you not to
> bother downl
> I have some questions about the networking that I hope someone can answer.
> Qemu is able to use tun & tap devices. I've taken the tundev.c program,
> which opens a tun device and passes the fd to qemu, and compared it to
> the tapdev.c program (which qemu is also able to use) and there's very
>
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Don Kitchen wrote:
I have some questions about the networking that I hope someone can answer.
Qemu is able to use tun & tap devices. I've taken the tundev.c program,
which opens a tun device and passes the fd to qemu, and compared it to
the tapdev.c program (which qemu is al
I'm very pleased with qemu's price/performance ratio.
I've used that one "pricey" product at work, but it always seemed a bit
expensive for home users. But I only knew about some of the other emulators,
the ones that are so slow you wonder why didn't they warn you not to
bother downloading the thi
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 11:28:53AM -0700, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
> Nearly? Oh come on... you know it ain't possible, period.
>
What are you refering to? The ability of a single qemu to ping thru slirp,
or the ability of multiple qemus to ping each other using their guest ips?
The former can be
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:54:48PM -0400, Matt Young wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> When I boot the install cd in
> qemu it probes the printer parallel port for a hardware plug that has the OS
> key
> on it.
> some reason, even tho I have the plug inserted in the p
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't
compile with gcc 4.x
I also understand that using a gcc3-compiled module (kqemu, in the
present case) entails a cgg3-compiled kernel.
You can compile kqemu with gcc4 even if
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, John R. Hogerhuis wrote:
Nearly? Oh come on... you know it ain't possible, period.
It's possible. It just entails adding something like vde to user-net
allowing multiple qemus to talk to each other (not using the slirp code).
but it's simpler and more robust to just use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was hoping to use qemu for running a virtual instance of a Opersting System
called Theos Corona (www.theos-software.com). When I boot the install cd in
qemu it probes the printer parallel port for a hardware plug that has the OS key
on it. If the k
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:18:02PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2005 16:59, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't
> > compile with gcc 4.x
>
> You can compile qemu and the kernel module with dif
On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 09:10 -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> > > I don't see any way for qemu guests to be able to
> > > ping each other
> > > (for example) if they are both using user-net.
> > >
> > it would be good to get that working
On Friday 30 September 2005 16:59, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't
> compile with gcc 4.x
You can compile qemu and the kernel module with different compilers.
Paul
___
Dear list,
I understand that the current "official" qemu needs gcc 3.x and won't
compile with gcc 4.x
I also understand that using a gcc3-compiled module (kqemu, in the
present case) entails a cgg3-compiled kernel.
I successfully recompiled such a kernel and qemu. So far so good.
However, this
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:15:04PM +0200, GaLi wrote:
> In the IDE BusMaster DMA specification :
>
> "The control registers for the controller are allocated via the
> devices Base Address register at offset 0x20 in PCI configuration
> space."
>
> If I read the word at offset 0x20 in the PCI conf
En réponse à "Jim C. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> > if tomsrtbt is the only guest : no IP given
> > if tomsrtbt is launch with -macaddr xx : no IP given
> > if tomsrtbt is launch after another guest : no IP given
> >
> > if I launch a real tomsrtbt, on a real host with a real DHCP
> > server on
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:17:04AM +0200, octane indice wrote:
> > I don't see any way for qemu guests to be able to
> > ping each other
> > (for example) if they are both using user-net.
> >
> it would be good to get that working :)
>
Alas, that is so difficult it is nearly impossible.
> if to
OK, thank you very much.
GaLi
Juergen Keil wrote:
I'm trying to write an IDE driver with busmaster DMA support.
My problem is that I can't get the right controller registers addresses.
In the IDE BusMaster DMA specification :
"The control registers for the controller are allocated via the
de
It's an IDE driver for my own OS.
I don't think it comes from qemu because linux get it right. I tried to
read linux source code but it's way too complicated.
I'll try in bochs and VMWare and tell you the results
Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Hi,
Which IDE driver do u try to write? for QEMU? or for
octane indice wrote:
[...]
Still doesn't work for me :/ I think that the problems comes
from the tomsrtbt.
if tomsrtbt is the only guest : no IP given
if tomsrtbt is launch with -macaddr xx : no IP given
if tomsrtbt is launch after another guest : no IP given
if I launch a real tomsrtbt, on a
> I'm trying to write an IDE driver with busmaster DMA support.
> My problem is that I can't get the right controller registers addresses.
>
> In the IDE BusMaster DMA specification :
>
> "The control registers for the controller are allocated via the
> devices Base Address register at offset 0x
Hi,
Which IDE driver do u try to write? for QEMU? or for a guest OS?
The IDE implementation of QEMU has few bugs (notice how the hack win2k
installation needs), so I would suggest to you to either try it with
BOCHS or with a trial version of VMWare.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 9/30/05, GaLi <[EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
I'm trying to write an IDE driver with busmaster DMA support.
My problem is that I can't get the right controller registers addresses.
In the IDE BusMaster DMA specification :
"The control registers for the controller are allocated via the
devices Base Address register at offset 0x20 in PC
En réponse à "Jim C. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> -- Début du message d'origine
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 01:50:47AM +0400, Brad Campbell wrote:
> > >No. In fact, the server is set up to always return the same
> > >IP in response to a request.
> > err.. it
Folks,
Here's a patch which allows guest CPU cycles to run concurrent with IO
syscalls:
http://people.brandeis.edu/~jcoiner/qemu_idedma/qemu_dma_patch.html
It's actually two patches -- a patch which enables DMA support (the same
one posted here a few days ago) and a second patch which appli
24 matches
Mail list logo
