Exciting indeed, this is seriously the most participation I've seen on any
thread or subject in all my time on this mailing list! (ok it's only been a
couple of years...)
This might actually be my first reply to this mailing list :)
I don't know how a reply-to setting "forces" participation in a
Hi,
Of course we smelt a rat.
As soon as that comment came out, I gave up on even reading the
discourse that followed.
Fundamentally many of the commentators do not realise that forcing
people to participate - i.e. forcing reply-to to be public - (imagine
be *required* to attend *every* Python-r
On 03/01/2013 23:19, Michael Foord wrote:
>> > > FWIW on lists where reply-to goes to the individual I*very*
>> > >regularly see messages accidentally sent only to the original sender
>> > >and not to the list.
Does anyone else smell a rat? How would he know Is Mr Foord READING
ALL OUR EMA
